New Articles – California Discovery Changes Including ESI, Improving Information Risk Management, Digital Evidence

January 1, 2013 changes to California discovery rules including deposition length, privilege logs and discovery of ESI, Click Here For Article.

Steps to improve information risk management, Click Here For Article.

Digital evidence, its value, use and loss, Click Here For Article.

Man Sentenced For Roll In Forged Will

Man sentenced for roll in forged will, Click Here For Article.

Will & Trust Contests – Decedent’s Pre-Death Statements About Intent

In will and trust contest actions California law holds that the intent of the decedent should control where his/her assets go. How do you determine the decedent’s intent? Certainly from the pre-death actions of the decedent and from admissible documents that can be authenticated and that aren’t out-of-court hearsay, but what about the decedent’s pre-death statements? Keep in mind that California Evidence Code sections 1260 and 1261 are hearsay exceptions that can be useful tools to bring in decedent’s pre-death statements.

Sections 1260 and 1260 provide as follows:

1260.
(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), evidence of any of the following statements made by a declarant who is unavailable as a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule:
(1) That the declarant has or has not made a will or established or amended a revocable trust.
(2) That the declarant has or has not revoked his or her will, revocable trust, or an amendment to a revocable trust.
(3) That identifies the declarant’s will, revocable trust, or an amendment to a revocable trust.
(b) Evidence of a statement is inadmissible under this section if the statement was made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness.

1261.
(a) Evidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered in an action upon a claim or demand against the estate of the declarant if the statement was made upon the personal knowledge of the declarant at a time when the matter had been recently perceived by him and while his recollection was clear.
(b) Evidence of a statement is inadmissible under this section if the statement was made under circumstances such as to indicate its lack of trustworthiness.

Dave Tate, Esq. (San Francisco)