Man Sentenced For Roll In Forged Will

Man sentenced for roll in forged will, Click Here For Article.

Will & Trust Contests – Decedent’s Pre-Death Statements About Intent

In will and trust contest actions California law holds that the intent of the decedent should control where his/her assets go. How do you determine the decedent’s intent? Certainly from the pre-death actions of the decedent and from admissible documents that can be authenticated and that aren’t out-of-court hearsay, but what about the decedent’s pre-death statements? Keep in mind that California Evidence Code sections 1260 and 1261 are hearsay exceptions that can be useful tools to bring in decedent’s pre-death statements.

Sections 1260 and 1260 provide as follows:

1260.
(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), evidence of any of the following statements made by a declarant who is unavailable as a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule:
(1) That the declarant has or has not made a will or established or amended a revocable trust.
(2) That the declarant has or has not revoked his or her will, revocable trust, or an amendment to a revocable trust.
(3) That identifies the declarant’s will, revocable trust, or an amendment to a revocable trust.
(b) Evidence of a statement is inadmissible under this section if the statement was made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness.

1261.
(a) Evidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered in an action upon a claim or demand against the estate of the declarant if the statement was made upon the personal knowledge of the declarant at a time when the matter had been recently perceived by him and while his recollection was clear.
(b) Evidence of a statement is inadmissible under this section if the statement was made under circumstances such as to indicate its lack of trustworthiness.

Dave Tate, Esq. (San Francisco)

Article, Family Wealth Is A Curse?

An interesting short article, click on the link. Is family wealth a curse? The author does a good job with the subject, but family wealth is an opportunity. The “curses” that the author discusses are more “manner of upbringing” or age, life experience or maturity related. Click Here For Article.

Dave Tate, Esq. (San Francisco)

New Alzheimer’s Study Re Treatment

A new Alzheimer’s study will focus on treatment, Click Here For Article.

New E-Discovery and Social Media Case – A Good Reminder

The following is a link to JD Supra’s post from Cullen and Dykman about a new case, regarding e-discovery and social media – a good, brief summary reminder for litigation attorneys, particularly in trust, estate and elder cases where family dynamics and emotions can be at issue, and people sometimes talk or express themselves through social media Click Here.

Dave Tate, Esq. (San Francisco)

Holding the Line on Charging Older People Higher Insurance Rates Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Limit on health insurance rates for older (over age 50) adults limited to 3 times the rates for younger adults under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Click Here for Article.

New Case – Service of Will Contest Pleading on the Attorney for the Party Who Filed the Petition for Probate was Sufficient Service; Estate of Moss

Estate of Moss (California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Case No. D058547, March 20, 2012)

Holding that service of a will contest pleading on the attorney for the party who filed the earlier petition to probate the will that was being contested was sufficient service as the attorney for the party who filed the petition for probate was that party’s ostensible agent for service of process for the purpose of the contest pleading.  However, the Court also specified that its holding was limited to situations such as in the Estate of Moss case.